关于交通事故鉴定的法律性质，学界一直存在着争论：是属于单纯的技术鉴定，只起着证据作用；还是是交警的一种具体行政行为，对案件的定性有着质的影响。
从交通事故鉴定本身的性质看，它符合具体行政行为的构成要件，却与技术鉴定有着本质性的区别。同时，交通事故鉴定所引起的法律后果的严重性和司法实践中的权力监督及权利救济，都需要交通事故鉴定具有可诉性。再者，从法律依据和司法判例的默示也能看出交通事故鉴定具有可诉性以及实际操作的可行性，而且认为交通事故鉴定不可诉的理由并不成立。因此，笔者认为交通事故鉴定是一种具体行政行为，应纳入行政诉讼的收案范围。
关键词：交通事故鉴定，行政诉讼，必要性，可诉性
On the legal nature of traffic accidents, the academia have been arguing : Is it purely a technical appraisal, which only plays the role of evidence; or to be referred to a specific administrative action that impacts on the quality of the nature of the cases. From the perspective of the nature of traffic accidents’ identification , it conforms to the constitution of the specific administrative action, but it is essential different from technical appraisal . Meanwhile, the legal consequences of traffic accidents’ seriousness and practice of supervision of power and rights remedy need the traffic accidents with litigation. Moreover, from the implication of legal basis and judicial precedents ,we can see that traffic accidents’ identification has the possibility of litigation and the actual operation, and the reasons that the traffic accidents’ identification is not appealed are untenable. Therefore, I believe that traffic accident responsibility confirmation is a specific administrative act, which should be included in the scope of administrative litigation.
Key words: aprraisal in traffic accidents , administrative litigation , necessity , lawsuit possibility
*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】
