超声波雾化吸入与高压泵雾化吸入治疗喘息性慢性支气管炎的比较
【摘要】 目的 比较超声波雾化器与高压泵雾化器雾化治疗喘息性慢性支气管炎效果的异同。方法 对60例确诊为喘息性慢性支气管炎急性发作期的患者随机分为两组(每组30例)，两组均按照指南予以标准化喘息性慢性支气管炎治疗。A组以超声波雾化器雾化治疗， B组以高压泵雾化器雾化治疗。结果 两组患者转为喘息性慢性支气管炎稳定期时间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 超声波雾化器和高压泵雾化器雾化治疗喘息性慢性支气管炎效果相当。
【关键词】 超声;喷射;雾化吸入;喘息性慢性支气管炎
[Abstract] Objective To compare similarities and differences on performance of ultrasonic nebulizer and high-pressure pump nebulizer used on 喘息性慢性支气管炎 cure. Methods To give standard 喘息性慢性支气管炎 therapy specified by guide on 2 random separated groups (30 patients in each group) of patients who are confirmed with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE喘息性慢性支气管炎). Hereinto, the A group is used by ultrasonic nebulizer therapy while the B group is used by high-pressure pump nebulizer therapy. Results There was not significant difference in the period from acute to stable status(P>0.05). Conclusion Ultrasonic nebulizer therapy and high-pressure nebulizer therapy have equivalent performance on 喘息性慢性支气管炎 cure.
[Key words] ultrasonic; spray; atomization inhale;
*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】
