论病理性醉酒的刑事责任

1997年刑法明文规定：醉酒的人犯罪，应当负刑事责任。从中我们可以看出在醉酒问题上，我国采用的是一概而论的方式。并没有明确划分出醉酒人的刑事责任能力。例如并非是因为自愿的原因而处于醉酒状态是否应该承担刑事责任？理论上，醉酒分生理性醉酒和病理性醉酒。对于通说认为该规定是针对生理性醉酒，故病理性醉酒应否负刑事责任，刑法实际上并未明确规定。有鉴于此，本文通过比较分析英美法系、大陆法系对病理性醉酒刑事责任的相关规定，从而总结出在生理性醉酒与病理性醉酒的问题上是不应该一概而论的。
关键词：病理性醉酒  刑事责任能力 醉酒者犯罪  危害行为
Abstract
1997 Criminal Code expressly provides: intoxicated person who commits a crime shall bear criminal responsibility. We can see drunken issue of using generalized way. And there is no clear division of drunken criminal responsibility. For example, not because of a voluntary reasons in a drunken state whether it should be held criminally liable? Theoretically, drunkenness points physiological drunkenness and pathological drunkenness. Tong said that the provisions for physiological drunken pathological drunkenness Should criminal liability, criminal law is not actually defined. For this reason, this article by comparative analysis of the common law, civil law pathological drunkenness of the relevant provisions of criminal responsibility, which summed up the issue physiological drunken pathological drunk should not generalize.

Keywords: pathological drunken criminal capacity drunken crime harmful behavior

*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】