论法律论证及其评价

司法不仅能定纷止争，还可稳定社会。司法要使人信服，就必须加强司法裁判的论证力。法律论证弘扬了法律规则的开放性，使传统的合法性、合理性、逻辑有效性和可接受性结合起来，以期实现司法公正，实现社会正义。因此，加强司法律论证的研究是树立司法权威的一个必要环节。法官通过法律论证，实现个案裁判公正，彰显法治目标。法律论证理论虽然在一定程度上对传统的法治理论有所修正，但总的来看，它是对法治精神的维护，是在新的历史条件下对法治理论的捍卫。因此，探讨法律论证的必要性，特征、及对其进行逻辑分析有着极为重要的理论意义和现实意义。
关键词：法律论证；法律论证比较；法律论证评价

  Legal Arguments and It’s Evaluation
    ABSTRACT: The administrion of justice does not only end disputes but also help social stability．The realization of leagal goal depends on legal authority．Therefore，the arguing power of judicial judgment has to be strengthened．Leagal argumentation has broughthonor to the legal rule openness,cease tradition the lawful rafionality effectiveness ofthe logic and acceptability unifies．Legal argumentation carries an important mission searching for the way to achieve judidal justice and social justice．By the method of legal argumentation,we can attain the justice of adjudicatiom In a specific case and thus manifest the objective of constitution．Although theory of legal argumeat has revised the traditional theory of rule of law under the new historical condition and thus it persisits in the spirits of rule of law．Strengthens the legal argumentation in the judicial judgment and sets up the judicial authority,establishes serves the judicial essential link for the people．Therefore,it is of the theoretical and practical point to analyze the necessity character and logical foundagon on the legal argumentation in the judicature．
Key words: Legal argument; Legal argument comparison; Legal argument evaluation

*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】