“扒窃”入罪的困境及出路

扒窃型盗窃是《刑法修正案（八）》新增的独立定罪类型，该行为严重侵犯了公民的人身权与财产权。但扒窃型盗窃罪也存在着若干争议，其本身存在着构成要件争议，主要从公共场所、公共交通工具、随身携带、财物这四个方面进行论述，采取限制解释与实质解释解决该争议；有关扒窃型盗窃与其他类型盗窃罪的竞合问题，论述了优先适用何种类型的盗窃行为及其采取该方案的理由；有关刑事处罚与行政处罚适用关系的问题，涉及了刑事处罚与扒窃行为的特点，并提出相应的区分标准。这三个问题是“扒窃入罪”的困境，这些问题的解决对于“扒窃入罪”具有根本性意义，有利于进一步实现刑法与司法实践的有效对接，加强与完善盗窃罪的刑法体系。
关键词：扒窃；困境；出路

Dilemma and Way of Pick-pocketing Crime

Abstract: Pick-pocketing type Theft is a new type of independent theft in the “eight Criminal Law Amendment., which violates personal right and property right seriously.  However, the pick-pocketing type Theft also has several disputes, such as the dispute of the constitutive requirement about the pick-pocketing type Theft .It discusses four aspects about public places, public transport tool, the carry-on belongings, and property issue and adopts restrictive interpretation and material interpretation to solve the disputes. About multiple types of Theft competing, it discusses what type of theft preferentially and reasons of scheme. About the problem of the administrative punishment and the criminal punishment competing, it refers to characteristics of the criminal punishment and pick-pocketing behavior and puts forward to the standards. These are the dilemmas of pick-pocketing crime. The resolution of these disputes has fundamental significance about pick-pocketing crime ,which can improve further the justice practice and criminal law to achieve an effective docking, strengthen and perfect the criminal law of the theft system.
    Key words:Pick-pocketing; Dilemma; Way

*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】