英汉语言在日常生活用语中的歧义现象对比分析

歧义研究一直是现代语言学家阐述语言理论的中心论点之一。本文从语音歧义，词汇歧义，句法歧义等方面对英汉语言在日常生活用语中的歧义现象进行比较与分析。旨在通过英汉语言在日常生活用语中歧义现象对比，探讨造成语言歧义现象的原因；分析英汉语言在日常生活用语中的歧义的特点；研究如何避免不应有的歧义现象的产生。以帮助我们提高语言理解能力，话语欣赏水平,以及提高语言运用能力和语言表现力。对歧义的分析有助于我们树立全面辨证的语言观，具有深远而重要的理论意义和现实价值,它会促进语言学尤其是话语分析的发展。
关键词：歧义；类型；形成原因；消除方法
Abstract

The study of ambiguity has always been one of the central arguments of modern linguists. This paper compares and analyzes the ambiguities in English and Chinese language from the aspects of phonetic ambiguity, lexical ambiguity and syntactic ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to explore the causes of language ambiguity, analyze the characteristics of ambiguity in daily life, and study how to avoid the occurrence of unnecessary ambiguity. In order to help us improve our language understanding, language appreciation, as well as language use ability and language expression. The analysis of ambiguity helps us to establish a comprehensive dialectical view of language, it has profound and important theory meaning and realistic value, it will accelerate the development of linguistics, particularly the discourse analysis.
Key words: ambiguity; classification; causes; elimination
Bibliography

Anthony Ossa-Richardson. Ambiguities of Type [J]. A History of Ambiguity ,2019(284) .
Bolinger, D. Aspects of Language [M]. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1981.
Fromkin, V & Rodman, R. An Introduction to Language [M]. Beijing: Peking University press, 2004.
Kempson, R. M. Semantic Theory [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1977.
Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. London Longman: Longman Publishing Camp, 1983.
胡壮麟. 语言学教程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社 ,2011.
林归, 董启明. 英语教学与研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.
林汝昌, 李曼环. 语义学入门[M]. 武昌: 华中理工大学出版社, 1993.
邱述德. 英语歧义[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1998.
张乔.《模糊语义学》[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1998.
王慧艳. 论语境的歧义消除功能[J]. 语文学刊(高教外文版), 2007, 第2期.
   朱德熙.现代汉语语法研究[M].北京:商务印书馆，1980.

*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】