许霆案中的法律解释问题

摘要
由许霆案引起的广泛讨论随着法锤的敲定而渐渐平息。但是此案解决之后，造成许霆案困境的背后的原因却也值得深思。从无期徒刑到五年有期徒刑，许霆的命运在广泛的关注下获得转机。此案重审后与原判反差之大，也使每个人不得不去思考法律解释的客观性问题。转型时期，我国社会生活日新月异，社会关系急剧变动，既有法律与社会关系之间必定会存在一定的差距。为走出这一困境，有人寄希望于加快立法或者新的司法解释的出台，但是我认为这个困境应该在具体的个案中，经由法律解释解决。然而，如何维护法律解释的客观性，使人们在转型社会状态下获得明确的预期，合理安排自己生活？藉此，本文梳理了法学史上对于此问题的理论讨论，并结合法律论证理论的有关理论对此困境的解决作一个展望。

关键词：法律解释，客观说，主观说，法律论证     
The Legal Interpretation of Xu Ting's Case
 
Abstract
Ting Xu was caused by a wide range of discussions to finalize the hammer with the law and gradually subsided. But the case is settled, resulting in Fujian was the reason behind the difficulties to also worthy of deep reflection. From life imprisonment to five years in prison, the fate of Ting Xu widespread concern in turn under. Review the case after the big contrast with the original, but also so that everyone had to think about the question of the objectivity of legal interpretation. The transition period, my social life with each passing day, the rapid changes in social relations, social relations existing between the law and will be a considerable gap exists. For out of this dilemma, some people hope to speed up new legislation or the introduction of judicial interpretation, but I think this dilemma should be in specific cases, through the settlement of legal interpretation. However, how to maintain the objectivity of legal interpretation, so that the community in a state of transition, clear expectations, reasonable arrangements for their own lives? In this way, this article sort out the history of the Law for the theoretical discussion of this issue, combined with the theory of legal argumentation of the theoretical solution to this predicament as a prospect.

Key Words: Legal interpretation，Objective theory，Subjective theory，Legal argumentation     

*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】