刑事庭前会议制度的适用研究

庭前会议写入刑事诉讼法，是我国刑事诉讼法的一次飞跃。通过庭前会议能够将影响程序公正的问题在庭前解决，提高了诉讼效率。但是依据现有的有关规定，对于庭前会议具体程序安排等问题规定尚较为模糊，不利于在实践中适用。
本文从刑事庭前会议制度的基本内涵和适用范围着手，通过调查及实际案例对比分析我国刑事庭前会议现状，以及当前庭前会议中存在的问题，提出有效的意见和建议。主张建立庭前会议法官制、赋予控辩双方以及庭前会议的启动权、完善庭前会议中的非法证据排除的规定、明确刑事庭前会议裁决的约束力以完善庭前会议制度。使其与既有的庭前审查程序相互配合，进一步规范庭前会议制度，以便能够指导我们的实践工作，进一步提高效率，节约诉讼成本。从而充分体现我国的司法公正性，为建立司法公信力提供保障，提高诉讼效率和审判质量的同时保障审判公正。
关键词：刑事庭前会议制度；内涵；现状及问题；建议

Applicable Research on
Criminal Pretrial Conference System
ABSTRACT: The code of criminal procedure stipulates the pre-trial conference is a leap. Addressing the impact of procedural fairness in pre-trial issues improve the efficiency of the proceedings s. However, the existing relevant provisions of the pre-trial conference still are relatively vague, which is not conducive to be applied in practices.
Through analyzing the basic meaning and scope and through surveys and comparative analysis of the actual status of the criminal cased, this article researches the current problems and proposes some effective comments and suggestions. Pre-trial conference judge system should be established, both parties should be given as well as the right to start the pre-trial conference, the illegal evidence exclusion rules should be improved, and the binding force of rules should be cleared. So further regulating the -trial conference system can guide the practices, improve efficiency and save litigation costs in order to fully reflect our judicial impartiality, to provide protection for establishing the credibility of justices, improve the efficiency of the proceedings and trial quality while guaranteeing a fair trial.
    KEY WORDS：Criminal Pretrial Conference System; Connotation; Current Situations and Problems; Recommendation

*若需了解更多与协助请咨询↓→[电脑QQ][手机QQ]【数据协助】